https://doi.org/10.4081/bse.146
Comparative analysis of different hydrogels for the bioprinting of 3D in vitro skeletal muscle models
Published: 29 September 2021
Abstract Views: 1661
PDF: 352
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
In this study we demonstrated an application of 3D Bioprinting using different commercially available hydrogels (CELLINK AB, Sweden) with the aim to identify the most suitable biomaterial for the proliferation and differentiation of murine muscle cells (C2C12).
How to Cite
Aliberti, F., Rinvenuto, L., Loi, G., Benedetti, L., Scocozza, F., Ronzoni, F. L., … Ceccarelli, G. (2021). Comparative analysis of different hydrogels for the bioprinting of 3D <em>in vitro</em> skeletal muscle models. Biomedical Science and Engineering, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/bse.146
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Gabriele Ceccarelli, Martina Balli, Riccardo Bellazzi, Maurilio Sampaolesi, Gabriella Cusella, Rigenera protocol: Elucidation of the mechanisms involved in wound healing , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022)
- Elena Delgrosso, Gaia Martina Sarcinelli, Federica Riva, Federica Riva, Franca Scocozza, Michele Conti, Ian Postuma, Silva Bortolussi, Cinzia Ferrari, Bioprinting for osteosarcoma model: Methodological aspects and experimental applications , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021)
- Michele Conti, Stefania Marconi, Ferdinando Auricchio, Biomechanical simulations and 3D printing for endovascular device testing , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020)
- Daniele Bianchi, Daniele Bissacco, Maurizio Domanin, Santi Trimarchi, Rodrigo Romarowski, Stefania Marconi, Ferdinando Auricchio, Michele Conti, Coupling in silico and ex vivo porcine model for the evaluation of biomechanical impact of TEVAR , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021)
Similar Articles
- Simona Villata, Lucia Napione, Désirée Baruffaldi, Christine Nardini, Francesca Frascella, Fabrizio Pirri, Electrostimulation of a 3D in vitro skin model to activate wound healing , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021)
- G. Cattelan, G. Gentile, C. Volani, L. S. Frommelt, A. Lavdas, L. Foco, M. De Bortoli, C. Altomare, L. Barile, S. Zacchigna, P. P. Pramstaller, I. Pichler, A. Zanon, A. Rossini, A novel human iPSC-based co-culture model to study neurocardiac interaction in vitro , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
