Packaging waste reduction in construction sites: eco-redesign of cardboard boxes

Published: February 10, 2017
Abstract Views: 1347
PDF: 691
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Packaging waste is a major contributor to construction waste, and cardboard is mainly generated during the electricity works. Of the environmental impacts caused by a product, 80% is defined during the design stage, including the impact of the packaging needed to deliver that product on site. This work proposes some strategies to reduce the packaging waste associated with two types of cardboard boxes for electric sockets, and evaluates the potential effects of these strategies. The comparison between the waste performance was based on an indicator defined by the Spanish Royal Decree for packaging and packaging waste, and the research performed on ecoredesign in other sectors was considered as the reference scenario to suggest some strategies to optimize the cardboard boxes. Although the results of the comparison do not show a big difference, together with the incorporation of some changes on the design they could help achieve some important savings for manufacturers, both environmental and economical.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Natalia González Pericot, Department of Technology and Building Management, European University of Madrid

Departament: Building Technology and Management

School of Architecture, Engineering and Design

How to Cite

González Pericot, N., Martínez Sierra, E., del Río Merino, M., & Liébana Carrasco, Óscar. (2017). Packaging waste reduction in construction sites: eco-redesign of cardboard boxes. Waste Recycling Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/wrr.2017.6