Thermal properties of fired clay bricks from waste recycling. A review of studies

  • Ana Ramos | aramos@usal.es Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Salamanca, Zamora, Spain.
  • M. Paz Sáez Department of Architectural Constructions, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
  • M. Ascensión Rodríguez Department of Construction and Agronomy, University of Salamanca, Zamora, Spain.
  • M. Natividad Antón Department of Construction and Agronomy, University of Salamanca, Zamora, Spain.
  • Jesús Gómez Department of Construction and Agronomy, University of Salamanca, Zamora, Spain.
  • Paulo Piloto Department of Applied Mechanics, Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Bragança, Portugal.

Abstract

The large waste volumes globally generated have increased environmental awareness, promoting waste recycling as a sustainable construction material. This study presents a review of researches that analyze the thermal behavior of eco-friendly clay bricks incorporating organic and mineral waste materials as an addition. Many of these works also provide data related to the composition of the material, and its physical, micro-structural and mechanical characteristics. Most of eco-friendly clay units increase the porosity of the ceramic, improving the energy efficiency of masonry enclosures, reducing the clay content and the energy consumption during the fire process. The positive effects of lightweight ceramics are an opportunity to improve the fire resistance inside green buildings.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2019-10-11
Info
Issue
Section
Papers from the 5th CILASCI Congress: Reviews and Articles
Keywords:
Eco-friendly clay bricks, Waste recycling, Thermal properties
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 299

  • PDF: 139
How to Cite
Ramos, A., Sáez, M. P., Rodríguez, M. A., Antón, M. N., Gómez, J., & Piloto, P. (2019). Thermal properties of fired clay bricks from waste recycling. A review of studies. Fire Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/fire.2019.71

Most read articles by the same author(s)